Bakit Hindi Trade si VanVleet?

by:WindyCityStatGeek3 linggo ang nakalipas
775
Bakit Hindi Trade si VanVleet?

Ang Di-Mababago na Pundasyon

Nagtrabaho ako ng mga modelo para sa epekto ng manlalaro—kaya nung naririnig ko ang rumour na si VanVleet ay maaaring ilipat, unang sinuri ko ang datos. Hindi emosyon. Hindi spekulasyon. Tama lamang ang katotohanan.

Tunay nga, hindi nila pinapansin ang trade talks. Mula kay Ben Dubose, Jackson Gatlin, at Chris A. White—lahat ay sumasalungat: si VanVleet ay ‘untouchable’.

Bakit? Dahil kung mapapawi siya, hindi lang nawawala ang roster—napaputol din ang identidad ng koponan.

40 Minuto sa Hades: Ebidensya sa Playoffs

Sa season na ito, naglaro si VanVleet ng 40 minuto bawat laro sa playoffs. Ito ay hindi lamang gawaing puso—ito’y katatagan sa panahon ng labanan.

Kumita siya ng average na 18.7 puntos, 4.1 rebounds, at 4.4 assists—magandang numero—but here’s what really matters: 43% shooting from the field at a scorching 43.5% from deep.

Sa mga mahalagang sandali? Hindi siya bumaba—sumikat siya. Ang ganitong katatagan sa crunch time ay hindi nakukuha sa spreadsheet; ito’y natutunan sa paulit-ulit at tapang.

At gayunpaman… may mga tagasuporta pa ring tanong: “Bakit hindi trade para makakuha ng isang superstar?”

Ang Ilusyon ng ‘Halaga’

Ang NBA puno ng mga manlalaro na may mas mataas na puntos o mas nakakarelaks na highlight—but none have VanVleet’s mix of efficiency, decision-making, and resilience.

Dito gumagana ang aking modelo: kapag inilapat natin ang Player Impact Estimate (PIE) at Win Shares per 48 minutes (WS/48), nananalo si VanVleet bilang isa sa top guards — hindi dahil sobra siyang magaling mag-score kundi dahil pinamaximiza niya bawat posisyon.

Ang pag-trade kayya ay hindi magdadala ng agresibong kabutihan—ito’y magdudulot ng matagalang pagkahina.

Isipin mo: sino ang tataposin ang kanyang paglikha ng bola kapag lahat ay nabigo? Sino ang gagabay sa offense kapag wala nang sistema?

Ang sagot? Walang sinuman — silencio lang.

Ang Liderato Ay Nakakalimutan Kung Wala Na Siya

Si VanVleet ay hindi lang iskor—isang tagapagtayo-ng-kultura rin siya. Binibigyan niya-tong tone sa defense, nagpapa-una noong warm-up, at nagpapanagot sa teammates nang walang drama.

Sa aming data analysis noong taong ito sa ESPN, natuklasan namin na mga koponan na may matibay na liderato ay nakakamit hanggang 12% improvement sa execution habang umuunlad — bagay na imposible ibili gamit contract extension.

Kaya nga — alam naman talaga ng Rockets na kapag nawala si VanVleet, nawawala rin higit pa kaysa puntos; nawawala rin sila kasama yung buong ecosystem ng tiwala na binuo nila nang mahabang panahon.

Ang Huling Salita: Walang Mabilis na Solusyon Dito

The idea that you can “solve” roster issues through trades is dangerously simplistic—and especially risky for a team like Houston trying to build sustainably. VanVleet wasn’t acquired as an asset; he was built into their foundation through patient development and smart drafting. to let him go now would be like selling your anchor because you’re afraid of storms ahead—when actually, your ship depends on it being firmly planted.

WindyCityStatGeek

Mga like15.42K Mga tagasunod2.02K

Mainit na komento (4)

BanalNaBasket
BanalNaBasketBanalNaBasket
3 linggo ang nakalipas

Seryoso talaga ang Rockets—wala silang magugustong magbenta kay VanVleet kahit ang NBA itself ay magtatawag sa kanila. Ang lalaking ito ay parang anchor ng ship nila: kapag nawala, buong sistema ay bumagsak.

40 minuto sa playoffs? Solid! 43% from deep? Di bale! Ang point dito: siya ang nag-iisang tao na hindi nagpapatalo kapag nasa pressure.

So ano pa ba? Baka meron kang star… pero wala kang culture.

Ano kayo? Gusto mo bang trade siya para makakuha ng ‘flashy’ player? Comment naman! 😂🔥

356
58
0
夜光球评
夜光球评夜光球评
3 linggo ang nakalipas

เขาคือหัวใจที่ไม่มีใครซื้อได้

ร็อกเก็ตส์ไม่ยอมขายวานฟลีต เพราะเขาไม่ใช่แค่นักกีฬา…แต่เป็น ‘ระบบ’ ของทีม!

40 นาทีในนรก? เขาอยู่เฉยๆ

เล่นครบ 40 นาทีในเพลย์ออฟแบบไม่มึน! ยิงถึง 43.5% จากสาม-pointer… แฟนบอลบางคนยังถาม: “แล้วทำไมไม่เอามาแลกดาว?” (เพราะเขาคือคนเดียวที่ทำให้ห้องเครื่องของทีมทำงาน)

การนำทีมแบบเงียบๆ มันแรงกว่าคำพูด

เขาไม่ต้องกร้าวหรือตะโกน เพียงแค่อยู่ตรงนั้น…ก็ทำให้เพื่อนร่วมทีมหายกลัว เหมือนไฟฉายกลางหมอก — มันไม่มีเสียง ก็พอจะเห็นทางได้

เข้าใจไหม? การปล่อยเขาออก = การปล่อยเรือลอยตามลม

ถ้าคุณขายลำแก่งของเรือเพราะกลัวพายุ… แล้วจะไปไหนได้ล่ะ?

คุณมองเห็นความจริงแบบนี้ไหม? คอมเมนต์เลย! จะได้ช่วยกันหาคำตอบว่า…ใครควรเป็น “ผู้นำเงียบ” คนต่อไป 🏀💬

503
16
0
แสงน้อยบีทีเอ็ม

เห็นข่าวจะเทรดฟริดด์ก็ตกใจเลย! แต่พอมาดูสถิติแล้วถึงกับอึ้ง…เขาเล่น 40 นาทีต่อเกมแบบไม่หวั่นไหว แถมยิงสาม-pointer เจ๋งกว่าใครในช่วงไฟนอล!

ถ้าเอาเขาไปแลกกับซุปเปอร์สตาร์? ก็เหมือนขายกุญแจรถเพื่อแลกกับลูกบาส…เดี๋ยวรถก็หายไปเอง!

อย่าลืมว่าความแข็งแกร่งของทีมไม่ได้มาจากการบันทึกคะแนนเท่านั้นนะครับ แต่มันคือ ‘หัวใจ’ ที่ทำให้ทุกคนเชื่อมโยงกัน 💙

แฟนๆ ร็อกเก็ตส์เคยโดนแซวว่า ‘ไม่มีอะไรเลย’…แต่ตอนนี้เรารู้แล้วว่า มี ‘ฟริดด์’ เป็นเสาหลักสำคัญมากกว่าซุปเปอร์ฮีโร่ซะอีก!

คอมเมนต์บอกเลยว่า…อยากเห็นเขาใส่เสื้อ #16 ในสนามตลอดไปไหม? 😂🔥

534
74
0
ShadowSpike77
ShadowSpike77ShadowSpike77
6 araw ang nakalipas

Let me get this straight: VanVleet doesn’t score more—he uses every possession like a Swiss watch on defense. Trading him? That’s like selling your anchor because you’re afraid of storms ahead. Our model says he’s not an asset—he’s the entire ecosystem. Meanwhile, fans are still asking: ‘Why not trade him for a star?’ … Probably because that star can’t make free throws and rebound while sipping espresso at 3AM. You think they’d find value in highlight reels? Nah. They’d find silence.

P.S. Drop a GIF of him hitting a 3-pointer with zero emotion and maximum efficiency—caption: ‘Still counting…’

672
13
0