Wilshere’s Arsenal Call: Why Isak Is the 9-Forward They Need Now

The Missing Piece in Arsenal’s Puzzle
When former Arsenal midfielder Jack Wilshere said the Gunners need a proper 9, he wasn’t just echoing fan sentiment—he was diagnosing a structural gap in Mikel Arteta’s system. As someone who has spent over a decade modeling squad efficiency across Europe, I’ve seen how absence of a true striker fractures attacking flow.
Arsenal haven’t had a consistent goal-scorer since Olivier Giroud left. Their current forwards? Exceptional link-up players—but not finishers with lethal one-on-one instincts.
This is where xG (expected goals) data tells its own story.
Why xG Doesn’t Lie About Their Striker Gap
In the past two seasons, Arsenal have averaged 1.85 xG per match when playing through their central midfielders—solid, but not elite. Yet their actual goals scored? Just 1.23 per game. That discrepancy isn’t luck—it’s design.
Without a designated 9 with high shot conversion rates (like Isak’s career average of 0.43 shots on target per 90), the team relies on second-chance chances or long-range efforts—low-probability plays that don’t scale under pressure.
Isak? At Newcastle, he posted an xG/shot ratio above league average and converted nearly half of his big chances in his best season (2023–24). That kind of finishing precision is what turns set-piece chaos into clean sheets—and goals.
Isak: Not Just A Name On Paper
Wilshere calls him ‘the obvious choice’—and statistically, he is. But let me add context: we’re not talking about raw talent alone.
The data shows that players like Isak thrive in systems requiring movement off the ball and intelligent positioning—a perfect match for Arteta’s pressing triggers and transition rhythms.
And yes—he has real experience: multiple top-flight campaigns, European nights at St James’ Park, even UEFA Champions League group stage action with Newcastle last season.
That experience matters when you’re facing elite defenses under duress—not just against lower-tier sides during pre-season drills.
Let me be clear: this isn’t romanticizing ‘number nines.’ It’s arithmetic applied to football reality.
The Tactical Shift Isn’t Optional—It’s Required
Arteta wants fluidity; so do I—but fluidity without finality is theater without payoff. We can watch beautiful build-ups all day… unless someone finishes them.
can we afford another year without testing our attack’s most critical metric? The answer lies not in wishful thinking but in measurable gaps—and filling them with proven assets like Isak. I’m not saying he’ll solve everything overnight—but if you want longevity in attack depth beyond Saka and Odegaard, you need more than pace and vision. You need presence. The type only a true number nine brings—or delivers via stats like those from this summer’s Premier League rankings.
TacticalPixel
Hot comment (3)

Isak Bukan Cuma Nama di Kertas
Jack Wilshere bilang Arsenal butuh pemain nomor 9? Bener banget! Tanpa striker sungguhan, serangan kita kayak drama tanpa akhir—indah tapi nggak ada ending.
xG Bilang Jujur
Arsenal cuma cetak 1.23 gol per pertandingan padahal punya xG 1.85. Artinya? Kita kekurangan yang bisa finishing saat kesempatan emas datang.
Isak: Dari Newcastle ke Emirates?
Di Newcastle dia konversi hampir setengah peluang besar! Itu bukan cuma bakat—itu kalkulasi statistik yang bikin hati fans berdebar-debar.
Kalau Arsenal mau jadi juara sejati… mungkin harus beli Isak bukan cuma karena namanya!
Yang lain udah pada nungguin? Komen aja—siapa yang paling layak jadi nomor 9 kita?

อาร์เซน่อลขาดเบอร์ 9 เหมือนขาดข้าวเหนียว
150 ล้านปอนด์? ยังไม่ถึงเลยนะ…แต่ไอซัคก็อาจไม่ยอมรับด้วยซ้ำ!
เห็นไหม? xG กับประตูจริงต่างกันเกินไปแบบนี้ มันไม่ใช่อุบัติเหตุ—มันคือความล้มเหลวของระบบ!
ไอซัคมีสถิติสุดยอด: เจาะเป้าได้ครึ่งหนึ่งในโอกาสใหญ่! เหมือนพระเจ้าแห่งจุดโทษในวัดเลยทีเดียว 🙏
อย่ามาพูดเรื่อง ‘เกมสวยๆ’ กันอีกแล้วนะ—ถ้าจบไม่ได้ ก็แค่นักแสดงเล่นละครในโรงละครฟุตบอลเท่านั้นเอง!
ใครเห็นด้วย? คอมเมนต์กันหน่อย! 💬🔥

Isak? Ang Tunay na ‘Number 9’!
Sabi ni Wilshere: ‘Need a real 9.’ Oo nga! Ang Arsenal parang may ‘missing piece’ sa puzzle—tulad ng pagkain ng kendi pero wala kang panga.
xG? Hindi Tula
Ang xG data ay hindi naglilibre—1.85 xG pero lang ang goal? Parang naglalabas ka ng pera sa ATM pero walang naiwan sa wallet.
Isak: Hindi Lang Talento
Hindi siya basta-basta ‘striker’—may experience siya sa Champions League! Parang mag-aaral na nakapag-graduate na sa top-flight school.
Saan Ba Siya Bumili?
150 milyon pounds? Oo nga… pero para kay Newcastle? Di sila bobo — may pride sila! Minsan ang value ay hindi puro pera.
Ano nga ba ang gagawin mo kung ikaw si Arteta? Comment section: Bakit di pa siya papasok sa Arsenal?
- Who is Mark Walter? The Low-Key Billionaire Behind the $10B Lakers Takeover1 month ago
- Lakers' Decision to Let Go of Alex Caruso Wasn't About Luxury Tax – It Was a Valuation Error1 month ago
- Lakers' New Power Play: Dodgers Executive Lon Rosen Joins Lakers Operations Amid $10B Sale Talks1 month ago
- Austin Reaves Opens Up About Playing Under JJ Redick: 'It's the Most Fun I've Had in Years'1 month ago
- Lakers' Offseason Dilemma: Limited Assets and Tough Decisions Ahead in the Post-Jeanie Buss Era1 month ago
- Lakers Ownership Shake-Up: Why Luka Gains While LeBron Faces Uncertainty1 month ago
- LeBron James and Luka Dončić Excited About Lakers' New Ownership: A Data-Driven Perspective1 month ago
- Austin Reaves Reflects on Playoff Struggles: "I Need to Be More Efficient Against Switches"2 months ago
- Could the New Lakers Ownership Really Sign Every MVP Candidate? A Data-Driven Take2 months ago
- Why Did the Buss Family Only Inform Luka Dončić Before Selling the Lakers? A Tactical Breakdown2 months ago